Ayers-Jones v. State

829 S.E.2d 878
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 20, 2019
DocketA19A0493
StatusPublished

This text of 829 S.E.2d 878 (Ayers-Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayers-Jones v. State, 829 S.E.2d 878 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Goss, Judge.

In 2016, Betty Ayers-Jones was indicted for felony murder ( OCGA § 16-5-1 (c) ) and distribution of methamphetamine ( OCGA § 16-13-30 (b) ). In 2017, a jury found her guilty of the lesser-included offense of involuntary manslaughter ( OCGA § 16-5-3 ) and acquitted her of distribution of methamphetamine. She appeals from the denial of her motions for new trial. On appeal, she argues *879that the verdict of guilt as to involuntary manslaughter is "contrary to the evidence" because the State failed to prove she committed any non-felony crime. For the reasons that follow, we disagree and affirm.

Construing Ayers-Jones's contention on appeal that the verdict is "contrary to the evidence" as a challenge to the trial court's denial of her motion for new trial on the general grounds pursuant to OCGA §§ 5-5-20, 5-5-21, "this is a ground on which only a trial court may exercise its discretion to grant a new trial; we do not have the same authority." (Citation omitted.) Calloway v. State , 303 Ga. 48, 51 (1), n. 5, 810 S.E.2d 105 (2018). Appellate courts may "only review the case under the standard espoused in Jackson v. Virginia [443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B), 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ], to determine if the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, supports the verdict." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lewis v. State , 296 Ga. 259, 261, 765 S.E.2d 911 (2014).

So viewed, the evidence shows that in the early morning hours of June 13, 2015, Ayers-Jones, Sarah Jones, William Knight, and Matthew Good ingested methamphetamine1 at the hair salon where Ayers-Jones worked in Louisville, in Jefferson County. There was evidence that Knight and Ayers-Jones loaded a methamphetamine mixture into some capsules, and that they put a stronger dose of the drug into one of the capsules, which Good ingested. About 30 minutes after taking the drug, the foursome got into an automobile, with Ayers-Jones driving, and headed toward Tybee Island. Good began to "trip out" and "act crazy," and was "speaking in tongues." The group eventually stopped at a Wal-Mart in Swainsboro, and Good acted strangely, taking off his shirt, pants, and shoes, and walking around the car. Once he got back in the car, he began talking about demons. The group decided to cancel the Tybee Island trip and head back to Louisville in Jefferson County, with Knight driving. Good's behavior remained erratic. He rolled down the window and "act[ed] like he was going to jump out" as the car was traveling down the road, and was "hanging halfway out ... of [the] vehicle." Ayers-Jones attempted to pull him back in. They eventually stopped the car on a dirt road in Emanuel County. When Ayers-Jones opened the car door, Good got out. Knight testified that he told Good that if Good did not get back into the car, "we're going to leave you." Good ran into the woods, barefoot. The remaining members of the group waited for about 35 minutes, but when Good did not return, Ayers-Jones put Good's clothes into the road, and the group drove back to the hair salon without Good. Ayers-Jones then smoked marijuana and took a nap. About two hours later, the trio went back to look for Good on the dirt road where they had left him. Unable to find him, they picked up his belongings and drove back to Wal-Mart, where Ayers-Jones and Jones shopped for swimsuits. Jones testified that, about 24 hours after Good went missing, she called the jail and Ayers-Jones called the hospital to see if they could locate Good. They did not call 911 or tell the authorities that he was missing, where they had left him, or that he was on drugs, behaving erratically, and possibly overdosing and in need of help. Ayers-Jones later went to Jones's mother's house, and said she was "hiding from the law."

Good's body was found on June 15, 2015, in a wooded area in Emanuel County and an autopsy determined that the cause of death was a "lethal dose" of methamphetamine. When law enforcement went in search of Ayers-Jones, seeking to detain her for questioning, they found her hiding under a grill tarp by the swimming pool at a friend's house.

OCGA § 16-5-3 (a) provides that "[a] person commits the offense of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of an unlawful act when [s]he causes the death of another human being without any intention to do so by the commission of an unlawful act other than a felony ." (Emphasis supplied.) Ayers-Jones argues that the evidence showed only the potential felony of distribution of *880methamphetamine, of which she was acquitted,2 and that the State failed to prove that she committed any non-felonious act which caused Good's death.

At trial, the court charged the jury on involuntary manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of felony murder, and on reckless conduct. When the trial court read this portion of the proposed charge on involuntary manslaughter based on reckless conduct to counsel during the charge conference, and stated that it would append the language of the reckless conduct statute to that charge, Ayers-Jones's counsel said, "That looks fine to me." The jury found Ayers-Jones guilty of involuntary manslaughter, predicated on reckless conduct, as a lesser-included offense of the felony murder with which she was charged.

OCGA § 16-5-60 (b) provides that:

A person who causes bodily harm to or endangers the bodily safety of another person by consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that [her] act or omission will cause harm or endanger the safety of the other person and the disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care which a reasonable person would exercise in the situation is guilty of a misdemeanor.

See also Riley v. State , 250 Ga. App. 427

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Arnett v. State
265 S.E.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Collins v. State
641 S.E.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Skaggs v. State
596 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Reinhardt v. State
428 S.E.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1993)
Early v. State
316 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
State v. Jackson
697 S.E.2d 757 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Vergara v. State
657 S.E.2d 863 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
Riley v. State
551 S.E.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
Lewis v. State
765 S.E.2d 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Cowan v. State
461 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Calloway v. State
810 S.E.2d 105 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Hood v. State
811 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Hood v. State
303 Ga. 420 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)
Calloway v. State
303 Ga. 48 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 S.E.2d 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-jones-v-state-gactapp-2019.