Averitt v. . Murrell
49 N.C. 323
Opinion
We think the law applicable to the case was fairly and fully expounded by the presiding Judge; and, for the reasons given by his Honor, we affirm the judgment. The instruction prayed by the plaintiff’s counsel had no facts upon which to be based, and his Honor acted right in refusing it.
Pek Cueiam. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Averitt v. . Murrell, 49 N.C. 323 (N.C. 1857).
49 N.C. 323 (Averitt v. . Murrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibbon v. . Lamm
111 S.E. 618 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)