Averitt v. . Murrell

49 N.C. 322
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1857·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Battle, J.

"We cannot imagine how, in'any proper sense, the burning of log-heaps in one’s own enclosed field, can be called burning his woods. The term “ woods,” as used in the statute, (see Bev. Stat., ch. 16 ; Bev. Code, ch. 16, sec. 1) means forest lands in their natural state, and is used in contradistinction to lands cleared and enclosed for cultivation. The. statute is a penal one, and must, therefore, be construed strictly ; but, whether construed strictly or liberally, we are clearly of opinion that the facts proved do not bring the defendant either within the letter or spirit of it. The judgment must be affirmed.

JPee Oueiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Averitt v. . Murrell, 49 N.C. 322 (N.C. 1857).

49 N.C. 322 (Averitt v. . Murrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caton v. . Toler
75 S.E. 929 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)
Mizzell v. Branning Manufacturing Co.
73 S.E. 802 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1912)