Avaine Strong v. Grambling State University
This text of 614 F. App'x 776 (Avaine Strong v. Grambling State University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Avaine Strong, pro se, sued his employer, Grambling State University, and various other defendants, complaining of his treatment as a university employee. The district court observed that “it is difficult to discern the basis on which Strong is claiming discrimination — his race, gender, status as heterosexual.” Nonetheless, the court dismissed, concluding that “Strong’s claims are wholly unsupported and merit-less.”
We agree. The district court admirably supported its conclusions with a detailed, eighteen-page Memorandum Ruling signed on March 25, 2015. Nothing in this record *777 suggests a violation of law. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons assigned by the district court. Strong’s motion to strike is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 F. App'x 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avaine-strong-v-grambling-state-university-ca5-2015.