Avaine Strong v. Grambling State University

614 F. App'x 776
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 27, 2015·No. 15-30316·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Avaine Strong, pro se, sued his employer, Grambling State University, and various other defendants, complaining of his treatment as a university employee. The district court observed that “it is difficult to discern the basis on which Strong is claiming discrimination — his race, gender, status as heterosexual.” Nonetheless, the court dismissed, concluding that “Strong’s claims are wholly unsupported and merit-less.”

We agree. The district court admirably supported its conclusions with a detailed, eighteen-page Memorandum Ruling signed on March 25, 2015. Nothing in this record *777 suggests a violation of law. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons assigned by the district court. Strong’s motion to strike is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avaine Strong v. Grambling State University, 614 F. App'x 776 (5th Cir. 2015).

614 F. App'x 776 (Avaine Strong v. Grambling State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related