Austin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Austin v. State

184 S.W. 192, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 426

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Austin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Tex. Crim. 492 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 15, 1916·No. No. 3984·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment assessed at 10 years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record, and the record contains no bill of exceptions to the admissibility of any testimony. Under such circumstances there is no question presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of robbery, and his punishment assessed at 10 years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of the evidence heard on the trial accompanies the record, and the record contains no bill of exceptions to the admissibility of any testimony. Under such circumstances there is no question presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Austin v. State, 184 S.W. 192, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 426 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

184 S.W. 192 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.