Austin v. State
163 S.W. 80, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 664
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Austin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 Tex. Crim. 573 →
Opinion
Appellant, was convicted of theft from the person, his punishment being assessed at two years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The record is before us with[81]*81out a statement of facts or bills of exception. In this condition of the record, the grounds of the motion for a new trial are not reviewable.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. State, 163 S.W. 80, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 664 (Tex. 1914).
163 S.W. 80 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.