Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6267
CHARLES ANTHONY AUSTIN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; M. MITCHELL, in an official capacity,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:09-cv-00485-MBS)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 9, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Austin, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Austin v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,
No. 6:09-cv-00485-MBS (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.