Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Fourth Circuit

Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

382 F. App'x 275

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 10-6267·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Anthony Austin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Austin v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 6:09-cv-00485-MBS, 2010 WL 412815 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the [276]*276facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Anthony Austin, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Austin v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 6:09-cv-00485-MBS, 2010 WL 412815 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the [276]*276facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 382 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

382 F. App'x 275 (Austin v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related