Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates

Fourth Circuit

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates

466 F. App'x 293

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates. Read the opinion of the Court — 584 F. App'x 177 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2012·No. No. 11-2427·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

H. Richard Austin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

H. Richard Austin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against all defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:11-cv-00373-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates, 466 F. App'x 293 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

466 F. App'x 293 (Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.