Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates

584 F. App'x 177
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2014·No. No. 14-1578·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

H. Richard Austin appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(3) against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Assocs., No. 5:13-cv-00877-BO, 2014 WL 1891419 (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates, 584 F. App'x 177 (4th Cir. 2014).

584 F. App'x 177 (Austin v. Douglas G. Peterson & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

H. Richard Austin v. Hanover Insurance Company
2023 DNH 053 (D. New Hampshire, 2023)