Austin Bros. v. Fields
This text of 84 S.W.2d 311 (Austin Bros. v. Fields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a suit for damages for personal injuries brought by appellee against appellant. The appeal is prosecuted from an order of the trial court overruling the plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas county This case is a companion case to that of Austin Bros. v. E. O. Sill,
Affirmed.
That proposition we now find raised the question that there was no testimony in the record showing that appellee sustained any injuries as a result of the collision.
We have examined the statement of facts and find that such contention is true, and therefore conclude that the assignment must be sustained.
A cause of action consists of (1) a right, (2) an injury to such right, and (3) the consequent damage. Phillio v. Blythe,
Without proof of any one of these, no prima facie cause of action is shown.
The judgment overruling the plea of privilege is reversed, and the case is ordered transferred to the district court of Dallas county, Tex. *Page 312
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 S.W.2d 311, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-bros-v-fields-texapp-1935.