Ausbrook v. State
156 S.W. 1177, 70 Tex. Crim. 289, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 266
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of a misdemeanor. The State has made a motion to dismiss the appeal because *Page 290 of an insufficient recognizance. The motion is well taken. The cause is dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ausbrook v. State, 156 S.W. 1177, 70 Tex. Crim. 289, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 266 (Tex. 1913).
156 S.W. 1177 (Ausbrook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carr v. State
82 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Berlew v. State
225 S.W. 518 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Herrington v. State
166 S.W. 721 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hearne v. State.
165 S.W. 596 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Albright v. State
164 S.W. 1001 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)