Bush v. State
151 S.W. 554, 68 Tex. Crim. 299, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 619
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 29, 1912
DocketNo. 1825.
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases
This text of 151 S.W. 554 (Bush v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bush v. State, 151 S.W. 554, 68 Tex. Crim. 299, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 619 (Tex. 1912).
Opinions
— The appeal must be dismissed because of the insufficiency of the recognizance. That instrument fails to recite the amount of punishment assessed against appellant. This, under the statute and decisions, renders that instrument so defective that it cannot attach the jurisdiction of this court.
The appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.
Prendergast, Judge, not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cooper v. State
288 S.W.2d 762 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Stevens v. State
110 S.W.2d 906 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Gremillion v. State
101 S.W.2d 560 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Privitt v. State
98 S.W.2d 204 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Carr v. State
82 S.W.2d 667 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Nami v. State
77 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Boyd v. State
39 S.W.2d 55 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Barnes v. State
272 S.W. 188 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Laughlin v. State
260 S.W. 865 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Mills v. State
254 S.W. 790 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Lamm v. State
252 S.W. 535 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
McCormick v. State
216 S.W. 881 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Huggins v. State
210 S.W. 804 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
O'Brien v. State
201 S.W. 179 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Denman v. State
178 S.W. 332 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Savage v. State
170 S.W. 730 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Herrington v. State
166 S.W. 721 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hearne v. State.
165 S.W. 596 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Albright v. State
164 S.W. 1001 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Holmes v. State
156 S.W. 1172 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
151 S.W. 554, 68 Tex. Crim. 299, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bush-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.