Aulakh v. Monsanto Company

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 9, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-00097
StatusUnknown

This text of Aulakh v. Monsanto Company (Aulakh v. Monsanto Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aulakh v. Monsanto Company, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

Ne Ne te eet ti ee a Ne Ne ed f Aer) eel ~— ct □□ Ne FO Be ee ee ON et Eee A —_ WV

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —378)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,728 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this □□□□□ period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: covic tod time, the Feb 08, 2023 Sk □□ □□□ SIATES GALAN ON John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

| hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: MARK B. BUSBY Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California by: gett finde Deputy Clerk

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 SCHEDULE CTO−378 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 1 23−00097 Aulakh, et al. v. Monsanto Company

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation
214 F. Supp. 3d 1346 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aulakh v. Monsanto Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aulakh-v-monsanto-company-caed-2023.