Augustus Geeter v. United States

401 F.2d 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 20, 1968
Docket20819
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 F.2d 176 (Augustus Geeter v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Augustus Geeter v. United States, 401 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and find that they are without merit.

Appellant contends that the prosecutor improperly argued with respect to the absence of an alibi witness, with respect to appellant being in the Tiki barber shop and with respect to appellant’s pretrial silence.

In his opening statement and closing argument, counsel for defendant brought up the absence of the alibi witness and the pretrial silence of defendant, and made no objections at the trial to the matters now complained of.

Reading the entire record, we find the argument of the prosecutor responsive to the issues raised by defendant’s counsel and not prejudicial to appellant.

Judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Augustus Geeter v. United States
401 F.2d 176 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 F.2d 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustus-geeter-v-united-states-ca9-1968.