August Williams v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
This text of 465 F.2d 995 (August Williams v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner was convicted on a Louisiana charge of aggravated rape and sen *996 tenced to death. After exhausting State remedies, he filed the present § 2254 application for writ of habeas corpus which was denied by the District Court. We vacate and remand.
Petitioner asserts two constitutional grounds for setting aside his death penalty. The first of these, the Wither-spoon 1 issue, need not be confronted because recent Supreme Court pronouncement makes clear that his second contention, the assertion that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment in contravention of the Eighth Amendment, requires reconsideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by the District Court. Accordingly, we vacate the District Court’s order and remand for reconsideration in light of Furman v. Georgia, 1972, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 and companion cases.
Vacated and remanded.
. Witherspoon v. Illinois, 1968, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. The issue here involved analysis of a Wither-spoon problem in light of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 799.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
465 F.2d 995, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 7887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/august-williams-v-c-murray-henderson-warden-louisiana-state-ca5-1972.