Audiovox Corporation v. The United States

764 F.2d 848, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15007
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1985
Docket19-1846
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 764 F.2d 848 (Audiovox Corporation v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Audiovox Corporation v. The United States, 764 F.2d 848, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15007 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

Opinion

BENNETT, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade (DiCarlo, J.), dismissing for lack of jurisdiction the suit of Audiovox Corporation seeking review of the denial by the United States Customs Service of its protest against the reliquidation of entries of FM radio converters at 6 percent ad valorem under item 685.29 of the Tariff Schedule of the United States.

The protest requested that the entries be accorded treatment under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), 19 U.S.C. §§ 2461-2465 (1982), and accordingly liquidated duty free under the same classification. The court found that an earlier protest against liquidation, which had succeeded in obtaining reliquidation at a reduction of the tariff rate, had nevertheless failed to request GSP duty-free treatment. Thus, such treatment had not been sought in a timely manner, and the protest against reli-quidation, in contravention of 19 U.S.C. § 1514(d) (1982), raised a “question not involved in such reliquidation,” removing the suit from the subject-matter jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade delineated in 28 U.S.C. § 1581 (1982).

Upon our review of the submissions and arguments of the parties, we affirm the dismissal below on the basis of the opinion of Judge DiCarlo. 598 F.Supp. 387 (1984).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States
861 F. Supp. 133 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
Washington International Insurance v. United States
16 Ct. Int'l Trade 599 (Court of International Trade, 1992)
Atari Caribe, Inc. v. United States
799 F. Supp. 99 (Court of International Trade, 1992)
Tail Active Sportswear v. United States
793 F. Supp. 325 (Court of International Trade, 1992)
Dornier Medical Systems, Inc. v. United States
747 F. Supp. 753 (Court of International Trade, 1990)
Philip Morris U.S.A. v. United States
13 Ct. Int'l Trade 556 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
NEC Electronics U.S.A. Inc. v. United States
709 F. Supp. 1171 (Court of International Trade, 1989)
United States v. Kingshead Corp.
12 Ct. Int'l Trade 127 (Court of International Trade, 1988)
CR Industries v. United States
10 Ct. Int'l Trade 561 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
Dow Chemical Co. v. United States
647 F. Supp. 1574 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
Leather's Best v. United States
10 Ct. Int'l Trade 321 (Court of International Trade, 1986)
San Francisco Newspaper Printing Co. v. United States
620 F. Supp. 738 (Court of International Trade, 1985)
Computime, Inc. v. The United States
772 F.2d 874 (Federal Circuit, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 F.2d 848, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/audiovox-corporation-v-the-united-states-cafc-1985.