Atwood v. Hendrix

439 So. 2d 973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 1983·No. AS-62·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

439 So.2d 973 (1983)

Charles ATWOOD D/B/a Miracle Strip Security Service and Kent Insurance Company, Appellants,
v.
Ruben HENDRIX, Appellee.

No. AS-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 25, 1983.

Kathleen V. McCarthy, Hialeah, for appellants.

Norton Bond, Pensacola, for appellee.

MILLS, Judge.

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred when it failed to find that Hendrix, the plaintiff below, was guilty of comparative negligence as a matter of law for running in the dark in a strange and unfamiliar area. The record shows, however, that this issue was never raised below. Issues not presented to the trial court will not be considered for the first time on appeal. Dober v. Worrell, 401 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1981).

AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atwood v. Hendrix, 439 So. 2d 973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 973 (Atwood v. Hendrix) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ehiabor v. Ehiabor
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Lubin v. Mishkin, Horowitz & Boas
554 So. 2d 585 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Campbell v. State
558 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
MULTITECH CORP v. St. Johns Bluff Inv. Corp.
518 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Parrish v. Dougherty
505 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kent Ins. Co. v. Estate of Atwood
481 So. 2d 1294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Our Lady of Divine Providence Catholic Church v. City of Sweetwater
482 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Marshall v. State
439 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)