Home/Court of Appeals of Maryland/Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett

Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett

44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 433
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 9, 2012·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 64, Sept. Term, 2011·Published

Opinion

44 A.3d 424 (2012)
426 Md. 433

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Charlene Sukari HARDNETT, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 64, Sept. Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 9, 2012.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Charlene Sukari Hardnett, Respondent, by her attorney, Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, be, and she hereby is, reprimanded for her violation of Rule 5.3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett, 44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 433 (Md. 2012).

44 A.3d 424 (Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hardnett
44 A.3d 424 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)