Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett
This text of 44 A.3d 424 (Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Charlene Sukari HARDNETT, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Charlene Sukari Hardnett, Respondent, by her attorney, Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, be, and she hereby is, reprimanded for her violation of Rule 5.3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-hardnett-md-2012.