Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hardnett
44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 433, 2012 WL 1608581, 2012 Md. LEXIS 270
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 9, 2012·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 64·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Charlene Sukari Hardnett, Respondent, by her attorney, Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, be, and she hereby is, reprimanded for her violation of Rule 5.3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hardnett, 44 A.3d 424, 426 Md. 433, 2012 WL 1608581, 2012 Md. LEXIS 270 (Md. 2012).
44 A.3d 424 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Hardnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett
44 A.3d 424 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)