Attorney Grievance v. Goldstein

19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 3, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 87, September Term, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.3d 903 (Attorney Grievance v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Goldstein, 19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

19 A.3d 903 (2011)
419 Md. 524

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
David Bart GOLDSTEIN, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 87, September Term, 2010.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 3, 2011.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, David Bart Goldstein, to disbar by consent from the practice of law.

*904 The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 3rd day of May, 2011, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, David Bart Goldstein, be and he is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Bart Goldstein from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldstein
19 A.3d 903 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-goldstein-md-2011.