Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldstein

19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524, 2011 Md. LEXIS 229
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 3, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 87
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A.3d 903 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldstein, 19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524, 2011 Md. LEXIS 229 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, David Bart Goldstein, to disbar by consent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 3rd day of May, 2011, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, David Bart Goldstein, be and he is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of David Bart Goldstein from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16—773(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance v. Goldstein
19 A.3d 903 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.3d 903, 419 Md. 524, 2011 Md. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-goldstein-md-2011.