Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek

486 Md. 339
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 19, 2024·No. 31ag/23·Published

Opinion

*

IN THE

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT

*

OF MARYLAND

v. *

AG No. 31

HENRY MARK BOBOTEK * September Term, 2023

*

ORDER

Upon consideration of the joint petition for reprimand by consent in which the

parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct violated Rules 1.1 and 1.15 of

the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct and § 14.5-810 of the Estates and

Trusts Article of the Maryland Code, it is this 19th day of January 2024

ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Henry Mark

Bobotek, is REPRIMANDED; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Henry Mark Bobotek, shall pay costs in this

matter in the amount of $1,114.65.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice

Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2024.02.1 12:04:31 2

'00'05-

Gregory Hilton, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek, 486 Md. 339 (Md. 2024).

486 Md. 339 (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 19t
Maryland § 19t