Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek
This text of Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek (Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 31 HENRY MARK BOBOTEK * September Term, 2023 * ORDER
Upon consideration of the joint petition for reprimand by consent in which the
parties advise that the Respondent agrees that his conduct violated Rules 1.1 and 1.15 of
the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct and § 14.5-810 of the Estates and
Trusts Article of the Maryland Code, it is this 19th day of January 2024
ORDERED, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, that the Respondent, Henry Mark
Bobotek, is REPRIMANDED; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Respondent, Henry Mark Bobotek, shall pay costs in this
matter in the amount of $1,114.65.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
2024-01-19 11:44-05:00
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Bobotek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commn-v-bobotek-md-2024.