Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith

36 A.3d 976, 424 Md. 610, 2012 Md. LEXIS 68
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 3, 2012
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 10
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 A.3d 976 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith, 36 A.3d 976, 424 Md. 610, 2012 Md. LEXIS 68 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day February, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Darlene H. Smith, be, and she is hereby, dis[611]*611barred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Darlene H. Smith from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Darlene H. Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Smith
36 A.3d 976 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A.3d 976, 424 Md. 610, 2012 Md. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-smith-md-2012.