Attorney Grievance Commission v. Powers

475 A.2d 1167, 300 Md. 25, 1984 Md. LEXIS 296
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 4, 1984·No. Misc. (BV) No. 17·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

The Court having considered the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed in these proceedings by Judge L. Leonard Ruben of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County; and

Judge Ruben having found that the respondents engaged in the practice of law under the trade name “Union Legal Services” in violation of DR 2-102(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility; and

Bar Counsel having recommended that a public reprimand be issued to the respondents; and

It appearing that the respondents were not cognizant of the prohibition against trade names contained in DR 2-102(A) and immediately discontinued such usage upon notification by Bar Counsel of the violation of DR 2-102(A); and

It further appearing to the Court that while “Union Legal Services” is a prohibited trade name violative of DR 2-102(A), see In re Corporate Name—Oldtowne, 285 Md. 132, 400 A.2d 1111 (1979), no disciplinary sanction is appropriate in the circumstances of this case and the charges should be dismissed upon payment of all costs of these proceedings by the respondents.

It is this 4th day of June, 1984, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that upon payment of all costs of these proceedings by the respondents the charges shall be forthwith dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Powers, 475 A.2d 1167, 300 Md. 25, 1984 Md. LEXIS 296 (Md. 1984).

475 A.2d 1167 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petition for Court's Approval of Attorney's ex rel. Trade Name
635 A.2d 1338 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1994)
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Powers
475 A.2d 1168 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1984)