Attorney Grievance Commission v. Page

883 A.2d 912, 389 Md. 122, 2005 Md. LEXIS 585
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided September 29, 2005·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 79·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The parties herein have jointly Petitioned this Court to reprimand the Respondent pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772. Upon review of said Joint Petition and for the reasons set forth therein, it is this 29TH day of September, 2005,

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr., be, and is hereby, reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED, that Respondent shall obtain an escrow and practice monitor for a period of two (2) years commencing thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, with the monitor making monthly reports to the Office of Bar Counsel for the first six months and quarterly reports thereafter; and it is further

Ordered, that judgment be entered in favor of Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, in the amount of $148.25 for costs against the Respondent, Alfred Page, Jr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Page, 883 A.2d 912, 389 Md. 122, 2005 Md. LEXIS 585 (Md. 2005).

883 A.2d 912 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Page) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Greenspan
910 A.2d 324 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2006)