Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman

29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, 2011 Md. LEXIS 634
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 6, 2011·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 42·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, to disbar the Respondent by consent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 6th day of October, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, be, and she is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Hilary Marlene Neiman from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman, 29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, 2011 Md. LEXIS 634 (Md. 2011).

29 A.3d 996 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman
29 A.3d 996 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)