Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman

29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, 2011 Md. LEXIS 634
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 6, 2011
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 42
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.3d 996 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman, 29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, 2011 Md. LEXIS 634 (Md. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, to disbar the Respondent by consent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 6th day of October, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, be, and she is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Hilary Marlene Neiman from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman
29 A.3d 996 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, 2011 Md. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-neiman-md-2011.