Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman

29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 6, 2011·No. Misc. Docket AG No. 42, September Term, 2011·Published

Opinion

29 A.3d 996 (2011)
422 Md. 346

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Hilary Marlene NEIMAN, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 42, September Term, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

October 6, 2011.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, to disbar the Respondent by consent from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 6th day of October, 2011,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, be, and she is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Hilary Marlene Neiman from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman, 29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346 (Md. 2011).

29 A.3d 996 (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Neiman
29 A.3d 996 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2011)