Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman
This text of 29 A.3d 996 (Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Neiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner
v.
Hilary Marlene NEIMAN, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, to disbar the Respondent by consent from the practice of law.
The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 6th day of October, 2011,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Hilary Marlene Neiman, be, and she is hereby, disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Hilary Marlene Neiman from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.3d 996, 422 Md. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-of-maryland-v-neiman-md-2011.