Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lee
This text of 981 A.2d 1233 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION of Maryland
v.
Garrett Lamont LEE.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Raymond A. Hein, Asst. Bar Counsel (Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, Atty. Grievance Com'n of Maryland), for Petitioner.
No argument on behalf of Respondent.
Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, ADKINS, and BARBERA, JJ.
ORDER
The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary or remedial action filed in the above entitled matter in accordance with Md. Rule 16-773, the response to the show cause order filed by Bar Counsel, the oral argument of Bar Counsel with no response being made on behalf of the Respondent, it is this 7th day of October, 2009
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby granted, and Garrett Lamont Lee is disbarred, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike the name of Garrett Lamont Lee from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 16-760(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
981 A.2d 1233, 411 Md. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-lee-md-2009.