Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoor

891 A.2d 327, 390 Md. 723, 2006 Md. LEXIS 61

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedFebruary 3, 2006

DocketMisc. Docket AG Nos. 3 & 9

StatusPublished

This text of 891 A.2d 327 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kapoor, 891 A.2d 327, 390 Md. 723, 2006 Md. LEXIS 61 (Md. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day of February, 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Eric Jag Kapoor, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eric Jag Kapoor from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-715(c), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Eric Jag Kapoor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day of February, 2006

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Eric Jag Kapoor, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Eric Jag Kapoor from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED, that the respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-715(c), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Eric Jag Kapoor.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 A.2d 327, 390 Md. 723, 2006 Md. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-kapoor-md-2006.