Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dominguez

44 A.3d 419, 426 Md. 424, 2012 WL 1592548, 2012 Md. LEXIS 265
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMay 8, 2012
Docket47, September Term, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.3d 419 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dominguez, 44 A.3d 419, 426 Md. 424, 2012 WL 1592548, 2012 Md. LEXIS 265 (Md. 2012).

Opinion

*425 PER CURIAM

ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 8th day May, 2012,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the respondent, Denese Dominguez, be, and she is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Denese Dominguez from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16 — 761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Denese Dominguez.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A.3d 419, 426 Md. 424, 2012 WL 1592548, 2012 Md. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-dominguez-md-2012.