Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bahgat

979 A.2d 167, 410 Md. 543, 2009 Md. LEXIS 642
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 3, 2009
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. No. 20
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 979 A.2d 167 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bahgat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Bahgat, 979 A.2d 167, 410 Md. 543, 2009 Md. LEXIS 642 (Md. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 3rd day of September, 2009

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Mina Bahgat be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the practice of law in this State and his name as an attorney has been stricken from the register of attorneys in this Court (Maryland Rule 16-713). Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761 for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Mina Bahgat.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. BAHGAT
979 A.2d 167 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
979 A.2d 167, 410 Md. 543, 2009 Md. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-bahgat-md-2009.