Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth

864 A.2d 1036, 384 Md. 536, 2005 Md. LEXIS 1

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth. Read the opinion of the Court — 381 Md. 561 →

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 5, 2005·No. Misc. Docket AG, No. 39·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of January, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Joe C. Ashworth be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joe C. Ashworth from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 5th day of January, 2005,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Joe C. Ashworth be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joe C. Ashworth from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth, 864 A.2d 1036, 384 Md. 536, 2005 Md. LEXIS 1 (Md. 2005).

Pincite

864 A.2d 1036 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ashworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.