Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports·Decided November 26, 2001·Published

Opinion

Gary E. Thompson Linn County Counselor P. O. Box 184 Mound City, Kansas 66056

Dear Mr. Thompson:

As Linn County Counselor, you request our opinion regarding issues related to the procedure for calling and conducting an election in which voters will determine the status of a city. Specifically, you ask:

1. Whether a petition authorized under K.S.A. 15-111 must comply with the requirements of K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq.;

2. whether a petition authorized under K.S.A. 15-111 is filed with the county election officer or the city council;

3. how the number of signatures required on the petition authorized under K.S.A. 15-111 is to be determined;

4. how an election called after the filing of a valid petition authorized under K.S.A. 15-111 is to be conducted; and

5. whether the ballots cast in the election are to be counted by the city council.

The City of Linn Valley is a city of the third class. Residents of the City have circulated a petition seeking to bring before the electorate a question regarding whether the City should be dissolved. The petition is ready to be filed. At this point, questions regarding the procedure to be followed in calling and conducting the election have been raised.

Cities of the third class are cities having a population of not more than two thousand inhabitants and are governed pursuant to K.S.A. 15-101et seq.1 Electors of a city of the third class are given the authority to vote on the status of the city.

"On the petition of a majority of the legal voters of any . . . city of the third class . . . , it shall be the duty of the council of such city, within ten days after the filing of such petition, to order an election by the legal voters of such city, to determine whether such city shall remain a city . . . , or be dissolved as a corporate body, and remitted to the conditions of being part of the township in which such city shall be.

"The election shall be conducted like other elections, and the ballots shall have written or printed thereon: `For a city,' or `Against a city,' and within three days after the election said ballots shall be counted by the city council, and the result recorded; and if a two-thirds majority of the legal votes shall be against the city, then the city shall thenceforth cease to exist, and the territory embraced within the city limits shall thenceforth be a part of the township in which said city was located, and governed in every respect under the general township laws. . . ."2

The statute recognizes that a petition seeking to bring before the electorate a question regarding dissolution of a city of the third class may be filed, but does not fully establish all the requirements to be met in filing such a petition.

"(a) Subject to the provisions of subsection (d), if a petition is required or authorized as a part of the procedure applicable to the state as a whole or any legislative election district or to any county, city, school district or other municipality, or part thereof, the provisions of K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq., and amendments thereto, shall apply.

. . . .

"(d) When any other statute imposes specific requirements which are different from the requirements imposed by K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq. and amendments thereto, the provisions of the specific statute shall control."3

"Therefore, a petition seeking to bring an issue before the electorate must meet the requirements of K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq. as well as any requirements set forth in the statute authorizing the petition, except to the extent there is a conflict."4 A petition recognized under K.S.A. 15-111 must comply with the provisions of K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq., unless K.S.A. 15-111 imposes specific requirements that conflict with K.S.A. 25-3601 et seq.

The documents composing the petition authorized under K.S.A. 15-111 "shall be filed with the county election officer or other official, if another official is designated in the applicable statutes."5 K.S.A.15-111 does not designate an official with whom a petition authorized under the statute is to be filed. Therefore, a petition seeking to bring before the electorate a question regarding the dissolution of a city of the third class pursuant to K.S.A. 15-111 is to be filed with the county election officer of the county in which the city is located.6

In order to be a valid petition under K.S.A. 15-111, the petition must be signed by "a majority of the legal voters" of the city.7 The statute does not designate the date on which the county election officer may look to determine how many residents of the city are registered to vote. Initially, subsection (f) of K.S.A. 25-3602, as amended, appears to provide the necessary date.

"When a petition requires signatures equal in number to a percentage of the total number of registered voters, such percentage shall be based on the most recent number of registered voters as certified to the office of the secretary of state pursuant to subsection (f) of K.S.A. 25-2311, and amendments thereto."8

This provision was added to the statute in the same legislative bill in which subsection (f) was added to K.S.A. 25-2311.9 At the time of enactment, subsection (f) of K.S.A. 25-2311 obligated each county election officer to "certify to the secretary of state the number of registered voters in each precinct of the county as shown by the registration books in the office of such county election officer" at those times prescribed in K.S.A. 25-2311 and by the Secretary of State.10 In 1996, K.S.A. 25-2311 was amended such that subsection (f) of the statute became subsection (g).11 The language contained in the subsection remained unchanged.

"The fundamental rule of statutory construction, to which all other rules are subordinate, is that the intent of the legislature governs where that intent can be ascertained."12 "Where the language used is clear and the meaning is subject to but one interpretation, an appellate court applies the expressed intent of the legislature."13

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney General Opinion No., (kanag 2001).

Attorney General Opinion No. (Attorney General Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaney v. Deere and Co.
999 P.2d 930 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)
State v. Smith
993 P.2d 1213 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1999)
Bonanza, Inc. v. Carlson
9 P.3d 541 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)
Robinett v. the Haskell Co.
12 P.3d 411 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)