Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports·Decided June 19, 1995·Published

Opinion

J. Ronald Vignery Vignery Mason L.L.C. 214 E. 10th Street Box 767 Goodland, Kansas 67735

Dear Mr. Vignery:

As legal counsel for unified school district no. 412 (USD 412), you request our opinion regarding the eligibility of a person elected as a member of the board of education for USD 412 to be seated on the board.

In the recent school elections, a person residing within member district no. 5 of USD 412 filed as a candidate for member of the board of education. The person was erroneously placed on the ballot as a candidate for member district no. 2, ran unopposed for that seat, and was elected to the board for member district no. 2. Upon discovery of the error, the person was notified that he was required to establish residency in member district no. 2 before taking office. According to the facts provided, "the newly elected member leased an abandoned farmstead in which he had never lived and which is not habitable at this time. He erected a post office box and declared himself a resident of District No. 2 to which he was elected, though physically residing in District No. 5." Correspondence, J. Ronald Vignery, May 19, 1995.

USD 412 utilizes the six district method of election for members of the board of education. Under such method of election, the unified school district is divided into six member districts which are numbered one through six. K.S.A. 72-8009; see K.S.A. 25-2004. "[P]ersons elected or appointed to be a member of the board of education of such school district shall reside in the member district corresponding to the member position to which such person is elected or appointed unless such person is a member at-large of the board of education. The member at-large may reside anywhere within the school district." K.S.A. 25-2022a; see also K.S.A.72-8009. The residency requirement is applicable at the time a person files as a candidate for member of a board of education. K.S.A. 25-2020.

In order to determine the eligibility of the person elected to serve as a member of the board of education for USD 412 member district no. 2, it must be determined whether the person is a resident of member district no. 2. For the purpose of determining the residence of a person offering to vote, residence is defined as meaning "the place adopted by a person as such person's place of habitation, and to which, whenever such person is absent, such person has the intention of returning." K.S.A. 25-407. Residence is similarly defined in the rules of statutory construction, with the additional proviso that "[w]hen a person eats at one place and sleeps at another, the place where the person sleeps shall be considered the person's residence." K.S.A. 1994 Supp. 77-201Twenty-third. [Indicia of the intent to establish residence are set forth in Irvin v. Irvin, 182 Kan. 563, 566 (1958), State, exrel. v. Jones, 169 Kan. 521, 526 (1950), and Arnette v. Arnette,162 Kan. 677, 680 (1947).] Based on the information provided, the lease agreement for the farmstead was not entered into until after the election occurred. The person elected to member district no. 2 did not have a place of habitation in member district no. 2 at the time he filed his candidacy. Rather, during the person's candidacy, the person remained a resident of member district no. 5, and thus was not qualified to seek the office of member of the board of education for USD 412 member district no. 2.

The election of a person to a board of education member district in which the person has not established residency may not be cured under K.S.A. 25-702. Pursuant to K.S.A. 25-702, the person receiving the highest number of votes should be deemed to have been elected to that office despite the occurrence of technical irregularities in the election of such person. The importance of geographical representation on a board of education belies any intent that nonresidency be a technical irregularity subject to correction by K.S.A. 25-702. Disqualification by nonresidency is not such an irregularity. In re Election of Massey, 227 Kan. 155,159-60 (1980).

The duty of the county board of canvassers is ministerial only and its sole function is to meet, canvass the vote, and declare the results. Wycoff v. Board of County Commissioners, 191 Kan. 658,663 (1963). The county board of canvassers does not possess the statutory authority to determine the qualifications of candidates.Coates v. Camp, 161 Kan. 732, 740 (1946); Attorney General Opinion No. 95-27. Upon completion by the county board of canvassers of the final canvass of general election returns, the county election officer is required to prepare and issue a certificate of election to each person elected. K.S.A. 25-3110; Coates, supra; see K.S.A.25-2009. Once the certificate of election has been issued, the election of a person who is ineligible to hold office at the time of election is subject to contest under K.S.A. 25-1434 et seq. K.S.A. 25-1436; State, ex rel., v. Irey, 116 Kan. 21, 25 (1924). The notice of contest must be filed within five days after the certificate of election is issued. K.S.A. 25-1439. It is our understanding that the person elected as a member of the board of education from member district no. 2 received a certificate of election and more than five days have passed since issuance of the certificate of election. Under such circumstances, K.S.A. 25-1434et seq. are inapplicable.

It has been suggested that the county election officer may refuse to administer or file an oath of office if the county election officer determines the elected person does not meet all remaining qualifications for holding office. Each member of a board of education qualifies by filing the oath of office set forth in K.S.A. 54-106. K.S.A. 25-2023; 25-2024. Taking the oath of office is a prerequisite to assuming the official duties of a member of the board of education. Attorney General Opinion No. 88-168; see State, ex rel., v. Stewart, 90 Kan. 778 (1913). In determining whether the county election officer may refuse to administer or file an oath of office for a person elected as a member of a board of education, it is necessary to review the provisions of K.S.A. 25-2024.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attorney General Opinion No., (kanag 1995).

Attorney General Opinion No. (Attorney General Opinion No.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wycoff v. Board of County Commissioners
383 P.2d 520 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1963)
Irvin v. Irvin
322 P.2d 794 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1958)
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. O'KEEFE
686 P.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1984)
Weston v. Lane
40 Kan. 479 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)
State ex rel. Schmitz v. Stewart
135 P. 1182 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)
State ex rel. Gregory v. Irey
225 P. 1050 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1924)
Jansky v. Baldwin
243 P. 302 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1926)
Coates v. Camp
173 P.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1946)
Arnette v. Arnette
178 P.2d 1019 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1947)
State ex rel. Conderman v. Jones
219 P.2d 706 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1950)
In re the Election of Massey to Position No. 3
605 P.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1980)