Attash v. Bush
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) HASSAN BIN ATTASH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-cv-1592 (RCL) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER
Upon consideration of petitioner’s unopposed motion to suspend briefing schedule, it is
hereby ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that petitioner’s counsel will notify respondents’ counsel when the issues
necessitating the suspension are resolved, and the parties will work together to set and present the
Court a mutually agreeable briefing schedule at that time; it is further
ORDERED that petitioner will not file his traverse or motion for judgment until at least
thirty day have passed from the date on which petitioner’s counsel notifies respondents’ counsel
that the issues necessitating the suspension have been resolved; it is further
ORDERED that respondents’ duties under the Court’s Discovery Order dated June 11,
2009, and the Case Management Order remain in effect.
SO ORDERED.
Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on March 29, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Attash v. Bush (Attash v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.