Attash v. Bush

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided March 29, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2005-1592·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) HASSAN BIN ATTASH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-cv-1592 (RCL) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER

Upon consideration of petitioner’s unopposed motion to suspend briefing schedule, it is

hereby ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that petitioner’s counsel will notify respondents’ counsel when the issues

necessitating the suspension are resolved, and the parties will work together to set and present the

Court a mutually agreeable briefing schedule at that time; it is further

ORDERED that petitioner will not file his traverse or motion for judgment until at least

thirty day have passed from the date on which petitioner’s counsel notifies respondents’ counsel

that the issues necessitating the suspension have been resolved; it is further

ORDERED that respondents’ duties under the Court’s Discovery Order dated June 11,

2009, and the Case Management Order remain in effect.

SO ORDERED.

Signed by Royce C. Lamberth, Chief Judge, on March 29, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Attash v. Bush, (D.D.C. 2010).

Attash v. Bush (Attash v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.