At&t Wireless Pcs Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty Debi Starnes
260 F.3d 1320, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18287, 2001 WL 901250
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 10, 2001·No. 00-15885·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether rehearing en banc should be granted, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
At&t Wireless Pcs Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty Debi Starnes, 260 F.3d 1320, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18287, 2001 WL 901250 (11th Cir. 2001).
260 F.3d 1320 (At&t Wireless Pcs Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council, Robb Pitts, Vern McCarty Debi Starnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
E. Spire Communications, Inc. v. Baca
269 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (D. New Mexico, 2003)
Cis Communications v. County of Jefferson, Mo
222 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (E.D. Missouri, 2002)
Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
224 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (D. New Mexico, 2002)
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Town of Ogunquit
175 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D. Maine, 2001)
Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v. City of White Plains
175 F. Supp. 2d 697 (S.D. New York, 2001)