AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council
264 F.3d 1314, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20407, 2001 WL 1049229
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 13, 2001·No. 00-15885·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
ORDER:
The parties have filed a “Notice of Stipulation of Dismissal of Appeal.” In accord with well-settled principles established by the Supreme Court in United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950), the appeal is DISMISSED and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to DISMISS.
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council, 264 F.3d 1314, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20407, 2001 WL 1049229 (11th Cir. 2001).
264 F.3d 1314 (AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, Atlanta City Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Qwest Corporation v. City of Santa Fe
380 F.3d 1258 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. City of El Paso, El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. City of El Paso, El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1
346 F.3d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of El Paso
346 F.3d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
SW Bell Telephone Co v. City of El Paso
Fifth Circuit, 2003
E. Spire Communications, Inc. v. Baca
269 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (D. New Mexico, 2003)
Cis Communications v. County of Jefferson, Mo
222 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (E.D. Missouri, 2002)
Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
224 F. Supp. 2d 1305 (D. New Mexico, 2002)
Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. v. Town of Westford
206 F. Supp. 2d 166 (D. Massachusetts, 2002)
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Town of Ogunquit
175 F. Supp. 2d 77 (D. Maine, 2001)