Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.

Fifth Circuit

Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.

174 F.2d 476, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2226

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1949

DocketNo. 12621

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 174 F.2d 476 (Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atchison v. Gulf Refining Co., 174 F.2d 476, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2226 (5th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in tort by appellants against appellees for the alleged wrongful acts of their employees. One of the appellees is sued as the surety of the sheriff, who'was not made a party defendant. We agree with the court below that the surety on a sheriff’s bond cannot be sued without joining the principal if the latter has not been sued, is solvent, and is accessible to suit; but the court not only dismissed the action as to the surety but as to the other alleged tort-feasor, who was jointly and severally liable, and we think this was error.

It is tru'e that the appellants had the choice of forum and the right to sue the appellees jointly, but this did not deprive the appellees of their right to make separate defenses. When the separate defense of the surety was upheld, it warranted the dismissal of the action as to the surety but not as to the other defendant. We have been cited to no statute or decision which shows that there is any special rule in Louisiana on this subject, and the general rule is that joint tort-feasors may be held jointly or severally liable.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed as to the American Employers’ Insurance Company, but reversed as to the Gulf Refining Company and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opin ion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action in tort by appellants against appellees for the alleged wrongful acts of their employees. One of the appellees is sued as the surety of the sheriff, who'was not made a party defendant. We agree with the court below that the surety on a sheriff’s bond cannot be sued without joining the principal if the latter has not been sued, is solvent, and is accessible to suit; but the court not only dismissed the action as to the surety but as to the other alleged tort-feasor, who was jointly and severally liable, and we think this was error.

It is tru'e that the appellants had the choice of forum and the right to sue the appellees jointly, but this did not deprive the appellees of their right to make separate defenses. When the separate defense of the surety was upheld, it warranted the dismissal of the action as to the surety but not as to the other defendant. We have been cited to no statute or decision which shows that there is any special rule in Louisiana on this subject, and the general rule is that joint tort-feasors may be held jointly or severally liable.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed as to the American Employers’ Insurance Company, but reversed as to the Gulf Refining Company and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opin ion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F.2d 476, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atchison-v-gulf-refining-co-ca5-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack