Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Moore

233 U.S. 182, 34 S. Ct. 558, 58 L. Ed. 906, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1279
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 6, 1914
Docket451
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 U.S. 182 (Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Moore, 233 U.S. 182, 34 S. Ct. 558, 58 L. Ed. 906, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1279 (1914).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendants in -error brought suit in the District Court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, against the plaintiff in error for damages, alleging that they were the owners of a certain race horse which had been shipped by *183 thém over the railroad of the plaintiff in error from Kansas City, Missouri, to Lawrence, Kansas, and which had been injured in transit. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendants in error, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma (36 Oklahoma, 433).

It appears that the horse, for the injury to which this suit was brought, was a part of the shipment under which the horse in j;he previous case of Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, just decided, ante, p. 173, was' carried as therein stated, and that the facts relating to the shipment and cause of injury set forth in the present case are the same as those in the Robinson Case. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma, after noticing the fact that, except as to the value of the animals, the extent of their injuries and the resulting damages, the two cases were identical in every material feature, followed the Robinson Case.

The present case therefore is controlled by the decision in the Robinson Case, and from what we have there said it follows that the judgment here under review must be reversed.

Judgment reversed and case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Mr. Justice Pitney dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 U.S. 182, 34 S. Ct. 558, 58 L. Ed. 906, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-co-v-moore-scotus-1914.