Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. County of Atchison

946 P.2d 113, 24 Kan. App. 2d 454, 1997 Kan. App. LEXIS 159
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kansas
DecidedOctober 10, 1997
Docket77,599
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 946 P.2d 113 (Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. County of Atchison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc. v. County of Atchison, 946 P.2d 113, 24 Kan. App. 2d 454, 1997 Kan. App. LEXIS 159 (kanctapp 1997).

Opinion

Hill, J.:

Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., is a corporation which has filed this appeal from an order awarding sanctions against it for filing a frivolous claim in the district court of Atchison County. No attorney has entered an appearance for the appellants in this appeal.

Except for out-of-state attorneys, the Supreme Court recognizes only four categories of individuals who may appear in the courts of this state: (1) members of the bar who have licenses to practice law; (2) individuals who have graduated from an accredited law school and have a temporary permit to practice law; (3) legal interns, who are law students supervised by members of the bar responsible for the interns’ activities; and (4) nonlawyers, who may *455 represent only themselves and not others. State ex rel. Stephan v. Adam, 243 Kan. 619, 623, 760 P.2d 683 (1988); see State ex rel. Stephan v. Williams, 246 Kan. 681, 690-91, 793 P.2d 234 (1990).

This means, therefore, that corporations can only be represented in Kansas courts by an attorney duly licensed to practice law in Kansas. Kansas follows the common-law rule that an appearance in court of a corporation by an agent other than a licensed attorney is not proper since a corporation is an artificial entity without the right of self-representation. Such a rule helps to maintain a distinction between the corporation and its directors and employees. See 8 A.L.R.5th 653, § 3. This rule was tacitly acknowledged in dicta in U.P. Railway Co. v. McCarty, 8 Kan. 125, 131 (1871), and U.P.R.W. Co. v. Horney, 5 Kan. 340, 347 (1870).

Since Atchison Homeless Shelters, Inc., does not lawfully appear in this proceeding, its appeal is not properly before this court, and this appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens v. Befort
D. Kansas, 2025
Schaake v. City of Lawrence
491 P.3d 1265 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2021)
Jarvis v. Wood
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2018
Jarvis v. White
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2017
Aida Oil Co. v. Unified Government of WYCO/KCK
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2016
Icon Agent v. Kanza Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2016
In Re Arnold
56 P.3d 259 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2002)
Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault
14 P.3d 1149 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 P.2d 113, 24 Kan. App. 2d 454, 1997 Kan. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atchison-homeless-shelters-inc-v-county-of-atchison-kanctapp-1997.