Asthmanefrin Co. v. Commissioner
This text of 25 T.C. 1139 (Asthmanefrin Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION.
Respondent determined a deficiency of $404.38 in petitioner’s income tax for the year 1949. The deficiency was, in part, consequent on respondent’s holding that the sum of $746.50 expended by petitioner in November and December 1949 for the payment of 1949-1950 real property ad valorem taxes on two parcels of real estate acquired by petitioner in April 1949, should be capitalized as a part of the cost of such property and that such sum was not deductible from gross income as taxes paid. This holding gives rise to the sole issue. A second issue stated in the petition has been conceded by the taxpayer.
With the exception of the one statement adduced by oral testimony — i. e., that the real property taxes for the year 1948-1949, which were prorated pursuant to contract, were capitalized on the 1949 tax return, all facts were stipulated.
Respondent contends that the taxes were assessed on January 1, 1949, the date the description of the real property to be assessed was entered on the assessment roll. Petitioner contends that the entry on the assessment roll as of January 1, 1949, was but the first step in the taxing process; that the tax was thereafter subject to revision by the board of equalization in the month of May and did not become final and a lien against the property until July 1, 1949; that when petitioner acquired the property in April, the tax was not a lien on the property; that no part of the tax was due and payable until November 1949; that under the Oregon tax statutes there was no personal liability for real property ad valorem taxes except in the single instance where the value of the real property has been or may be substantially dissipated, removed, or destroyed by the owner thereof or by his authority.
In brief the stipulated facts are:
Petitioner is an Oregon corporation located in Portland, Oregon, and filed its corporation income tax return for the year 1949 with the then collector of internal revenue at Portland, Oregon.
Petitioner kept its books and filed its income tax returns on an accrual basis of accounting on the basis of the calendar year.
On or about March 30, 1949, the petitioner, as purchaser, and Ryehen M. Paddack and Juanita W. Paddack, as sellers, entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of certain land with a building thereon located in the City of Portland, County of Multnomah, State of Oregon. The contract provided that the real property taxes for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1948, and ending June 30, 1949, were to be prorated between the parties on a fiscal year basis. No mention or agreement whatsoever was made in the contract for the payment of the real property taxes for the fiscal year commencing July 1,1949, and ending June 30,1950. Pursuant to the contract the real property was duly conveyed by Ryehen M. Paddack and Juanita W. Paddack to petitioner on April 13,1949, by a warranty deed dated April 13, 1949, recorded April 28, 1949, in Book 1332 at page 490, Deed Records of Multnomah County, Oregon.
On or about April 8, 1949, the petitioner, as purchaser, and T. R. Asbahr and Florence N. Asbahr, as sellers, entered into a contract for the purchase and sale of certain land located in the City of Portland, County of Multnomah, State of Oregon. The contract provided that the real property taxes for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1948, and ending June 30,1949, were to be prorated between the parties on a fiscal year basis. No mention or agreement whatsoever was made in the contract for the payment of the real property taxes for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1949, and ending June 30, 1950. Pursuant to the contract the land was duly conveyed by T. R. Asbahr and Florence N. Asbahr to petitioner on April 25, 1949, by a warranty deed dated April 25,1949, recorded April 26,1949, ill Book 1332 at page 154, Deed Eecords of Multnomah County, Oregon.
On November 7,1949, the petitioner paid the sum of $679.72 to the sheriff and tax collector of Multnomah County, Oregon, for property taxes assessed on the real property acquired April 13,1949. The taxes paid November 7, 1949, were assessed January 1, 1949, for the tax year beginning July 1,1949, and ending June 30,1950.
On December 5, 1949, the petitioner paid the sum of $66.78 to the sheriff and tax collector of Multnomah County, Oregon, for taxes assessed on the tract of land acquired April 25, 1949. The taxes paid December 5,1949, were assessed January 1,1949, for the tax year beginning July 1,1949, and ending June 30,1950.
The real property acquired by petitioner on April 13, 1949, was assessed by the county assessor of Multnomah County, Oregon, on the January 1, 1949, assessment roll in the name of Bychen M. Pad-dack and Juanita W. Paddack. At no time during the calendar year 1949 was the value of such real property substantially dissipated, removed, or destroyed.
The real property acquired by petitioner on April 25, 1949, was assessed by the county assessor of Multnomah County, Oregon, on the January 1, 1949, assessment roll in the name of T. B. Asbahr and Florence N. Asbahr. At no time during the calendar year 1949 was the value of such real property substantially dissipated, removed, or destroyed.
It is thoroughly settled that the purchaser of real property who thereafter pays the tax thereon for the year of purchase may deduct real property ad valorem taxes assessed against the property before he acquires title to it if no lien has attached to the property for the taxes prior to acquisition and the taxes were not a personal debt of the vendor under the applicable law. Magruder v. Supplee, 316 U. S. 394; Robert LeRoy, 4 T. C. 70, affd. 152 F. 2d 936; Adda, Inc., 9 T. C. 199, affd. 171 F. 2d 367; F. A. Gillespie Trust, 21 T. C. 739. Thus, in the present case, if under Oregon law, there was neither a personal liability on the part of petitioner’s grantor nor any lien on the real property prior to the date of the sale, petitioner was entitled to deduct the full amount of the 1949-1950 real property ad valorem taxes paid by it in the year 1949.
There is no question that the lien for Oregon real property ad valorem taxes comes into existence on the first day of July of the taxable year. (Sec. 110-829, Ore. Comp. Laws Ann.)1 Thus, when petitioner acquired title to the two parcels of real property during April 1949, the lien for the taxes in question bad not become affixed against the property and did not so become a lien until July 1, 1949, at which time petitioner was the owner of the property. There is no personal liability for real property ad valorem taxes in the State of Oregon excepting one isolated instance which is specified by statute. (Sec. 110-1001, Ore. Comp. Laws Ann.)2 Under this provision, personal liability for taxes levied on real property exists where the value of such property is or may be substantially dissipated, removed, or destroyed by the owner or by his authority subsequent to the assessment day of any year. In the present case it has been stipulated as a fact that at no time during the calendar year 1949 was the value of any of the real property in question substantially dissipated, removed, or destroyed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 T.C. 1139, 1956 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/asthmanefrin-co-v-commissioner-tax-1956.