Ashley v. Willard

Supreme Court of Vermont

Ashley v. Willard

2 Tyl. 391

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedFebruary 15, 1803

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 Tyl. 391 (Ashley v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ashley v. Willard, 2 Tyl. 391 (Vt. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

Sed per Curiam.

The joint promisors to a note are copartners in the contract, and the payment of [392]*392one is the payment of both. If the promisee is indebted to both or either, they may join in a declaration in set-off, and have several counts; some applicable to the demands of one, and-some to the demands of the other; or entirely to the demands of 'one, or the joint demands of both.

Cephas Smith, Junior, for the plaintiff. Chauncey Langdon, for defendant.

Plaintiff nonsuited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sed per Curiam.

The joint promisors to a note are copartners in the contract, and the payment of [392]*392one is the payment of both. If the promisee is indebted to both or either, they may join in a declaration in set-off, and have several counts; some applicable to the demands of one, and-some to the demands of the other; or entirely to the demands of 'one, or the joint demands of both.

Cephas Smith, Junior, for the plaintiff. Chauncey Langdon, for defendant.

Plaintiff nonsuited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Tyl. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashley-v-willard-vt-1803.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack