Ashland Oil Co. v. Bean

300 S.E.2d 739, 225 Va. 1, 1983 Va. LEXIS 184
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedMarch 11, 1983
DocketRecord 820349
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 300 S.E.2d 739 (Ashland Oil Co. v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ashland Oil Co. v. Bean, 300 S.E.2d 739, 225 Va. 1, 1983 Va. LEXIS 184 (Va. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, we must decide whether, when work conditions aggravate an ordinary disease of life pre-existing employment, a disability resulting therefrom is compensable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Shirley Bean, employed for most of her life as a waitress, began work as a gas station attendant for Ashland Oil Company in June 1980. She worked alone in six-hour and nine-hour shifts without scheduled breaks or lunch hours, and her duties required her to be constantly on her feet. As part of her uniform, Bean was required to buy and wear “closed shoes” with hard soles. In November, she began having pain in her left foot, and in February she consulted Dr. Bruce Vogel, a podiatrist. Dr. Vogel diagnosed her condition as “chronic bursitis secondary to hallux valgus, metatarsus primus varus, inflamed metatarsal-phalangeal joint (bunion) [secondary] to repeated trauma.” Bean underwent surgery (“Bunionectomy left foot” and “Wedge osteotomy 1st metatarsal”) on March 4, 1981, and thereafter was unable to return to work.

In his attending physician’s report, Dr. Vogel noted: “Pre-existing condition: patient stated she had a small ‘bump’ for a few *3 years before she began her job but that it never caused her any problems.” In a letter addressed to Bean’s employer, he said that “[t]he amount of time spent on her feet in closed hard shoes was definitely a factor in the cause of her problem.”

Bean filed an application against her employer and its insurer, Insurance Company of North America, seeking compensation for disability resulting from “Occupational Disease”. A deputy commissioner found “an insufficient causal connection to hold this to be a compensable occupational disease” and denied the claim. On review, the full Commission, with one member dissenting, found that Bean “became disabled as a result of inflammation of a preexisting bunion on her left foot.” The Commission entered an award in Bean’s favor on the ground that “the claimant’s pre-existing condition was aggravated by her work to the point that it became disabling”.

The Commission’s findings of fact are not challenged on appeal. The issue before us is a question of law. At every stage of the proceedings below, the parties and the Commission treated Bean’s bunion condition as a disease pre-existing her employment and the claim as one governed by the provisions of Code § 65.1-46. On appeal, we analyze the case as it was tried.

Code § 65.1-46 provides that “the term ‘occupational disease’ means a disease arising out of and in the course of the employment.” Explicating that definition, the statute states that “[a] disease shall be deemed to arise out of the employment only if . . . [it] had its origin in a risk connected with the employment”. Bean’s disease did not arise out of her employment because its origin antedated her employment. Hence, it was not an occupational disease, and only disabilities resulting from occupational diseases are compensable. The statute expressly provides that, with certain exceptions inapplicable here, “[n]o ordinary disease of life to which the general public is exposed outside of the employment shall be compensable”.

Apparently, the Commission concluded that Bean’s disability was compensable because the underlying disease was aggravated by “a risk connected with the employment”. If so, the Commission implicitly overruled its own holdings in earlier cases. “[T]here is no provision under the occupational disease law of our Act permitting recovery for aggravation of ordinary diseases of life.” Kaufman v. Star Band Company, Inc., 56 O.I.C. 190, 192 (1974) (duodenal ulcer); accord Sullins v. Southern States Coop *4 erative, Inc., 49 O.I.C. 315 (1967) (bronchial asthma); Noel v. Virginia Chemicals, Inc., 48 O.I.C. 177 (1966) (sinusitis); Burner v. Southern Lightweight Aggregate Corp., 31 O.I.C. 239 (1949) (dermatitis). See also Perrin v. Brunswick Corp., 333 F. Supp. 221, 223 (W.D. Va. 1971) (pneumothorax), where the court quoted and applied the opinion of a deputy commissioner who held that “ ‘an ordinary disease, of life aggravated by work environment is [not] compensable under the Act.’ ”

We hold that the Commission misapplied the controlling statute, and we will reverse the award and dismiss the claim.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Red Baron Coal Company v. Harold L. Hess
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2003
Blue Ridge Market of Virginia, Inc. v. Patton
575 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2003)
Medlin v. County of Henrico Police
542 S.E.2d 33 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2001)
Stephen Douglas Vass v. County of Henrico Police
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2001
The Genie Company v. Marsha Hammer
527 S.E.2d 470 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2000)
Great Eastern Resort Corp. v. Gordon
525 S.E.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2000)
Anne Griffin Miller v. County of James City
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1996
Lois v. Rucker v. Bacova Guild, Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1995
Ronald R. Tolbert, Jr. v. Electrolux Corp.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1995
Joanie Marie Bryant v. Tultex Corporation
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1995
Marcus v. Arlington County Board of Supervisors
425 S.E.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1993)
Teasley v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.
415 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1992)
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick
376 S.E.2d 814 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1989)
Belcher v. City of Hampton
338 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1986)
Woody v. Mark Winkler Management, Inc.
336 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1985)
Western Electric Co. v. Gilliam
329 S.E.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1985)
Caskey v. Dan River Mills, Inc.
302 S.E.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 S.E.2d 739, 225 Va. 1, 1983 Va. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ashland-oil-co-v-bean-va-1983.