Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Asgharzadeh v. Kurkill

Asgharzadeh v. Kurkill

149 A.D.2d 449, 540 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4639
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 1989·Published

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutch[450]*450ess County (Benson, J.), entered June 6, 1988, as denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to serve an amended answer to the amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the Supreme Court’s denial of leave to serve an amended answer was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Gallo v Aiello, 139 AD2d 490; Fulford v Baker Perkins, Inc., 100 AD2d 861; Perricone v City of New York, 96 AD2d 531, 533, affd 62 NY2d 661). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asgharzadeh v. Kurkill, 149 A.D.2d 449, 540 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

149 A.D.2d 449 (Asgharzadeh v. Kurkill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perricone v. City of New York
464 N.E.2d 980 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Perricone v. City of New York
96 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Fulford v. Baker Perkins, Inc.
100 A.D.2d 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Gallo v. Aiello
139 A.D.2d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)