Home/New York Court of Appeals/Perricone v. City of New York

Perricone v. City of New York

464 N.E.2d 980, 62 N.Y.2d 661, 476 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4277
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by50 cases

This text of 464 N.E.2d 980 (Perricone v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Perricone v. City of New York, 464 N.E.2d 980, 62 N.Y.2d 661, 476 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4277 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal in the action against defendant John T. Brady and Co. should be dismissed, without costs, and the order of the Appellate Division should otherwise he affirmed, with costs.

*663 Plaintiff does not, and cannot, seriously dispute that the Appellate Division’s order, insofar as it denied his motions concerning his action against John T. Brady & Co., is nonfinal. As a result, the appeal as against John T. Brady & Co. must be dismissed. (See Powell v Gates-Chili Cent. School Dist., 41 NY2d 827.)

As to the Appellate Division’s dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint against the City of New York for failure to move for entry of a default judgment, we find no legal error in that determination. CPLR 3215 (subd [c]) provides that if the plaintiff “fails to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after the default, the court shall not enter judgment but shall dismiss the complaint as abandoned, without costs, upon its own initiative or on motion, unless sufficient cause is shown why the complaint should not be dismissed.”

Plaintiff allegedly served his complaint upon defendant on May 17, 1971 and the city never answered. Notwithstanding that more than 10 years have elapsed since the action was allegedly commenced, the plaintiff has made no attempt to obtain entry of a default judgment. Having failed to comply with the statutory requirements, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed by the Appellate Division and we find no legal error in that decision. (See Chin v Hooker, 95 AD2d 790; Winkelman v H & S Beer & Soda Discounts, 91 AD2d 660.)

Plaintiff’s argument that the city waived its right to move for dismissal of the complaint is unpersuasive inasmuch as the Appellate Division exercised its authority under CPLR 3215 (subd [c]) and dismissed the complaint on its own initiative. Nor can plaintiff be heard to complain that he had no notice that the Appellate Division intended to act pursuant to the statute and, therefore, had no opportunity to demonstrate sufficient cause why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff was aware for more than ten years that the city had not answered, yet failed to move for a default judgment. Furthermore, he never requested reargument at the Appellate Division or sought remittal by that court to Supreme Court to afford him an opportunity to supplement the record to show sufficient cause why the complaint should not be dismissed.

*664 Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.

On the appeal as against defendant John T. Brady & Co.: Appeal dismissed, without costs.

On the appeal as against the City of New York: Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kim v. Francis
2024 NY Slip Op 05639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Kanner v. Westchester Med. Group, P.L.L.C.
New York Supreme Court, 2023
A.H. Physical Therapy, P.C. v. 21st Century Advantage Ins. Co.
161 N.Y.S.3d 622 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Chase Home Fin., LLC v. Fernandez
2019 NY Slip Op 6589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Checksfield v. Berg
148 A.D.3d 1376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Maria De Lourdes Torres v. Police Officer Jones
47 N.E.3d 747 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Ploski
36 Misc. 3d 186 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
Giglio v. NTIMP Inc.
86 A.D.3d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Brown v. Andreoli
81 A.D.3d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Solano v. Castro
72 A.D.3d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Scrimenti v. Dry Harbor Nursing Home
34 A.D.3d 439 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Counsel Abstract, Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Jerome Auto Center, Inc.
23 A.D.3d 274 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Blake v. Wieczorek
305 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Dickstein v. Dogali
303 A.D.2d 443 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Boyd v. Trent
297 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Moxson v. United Airlines
282 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Opia v. Chukwu
278 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Reape v. City of New York
272 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Turnier v. Asbestos Carting Corp.
256 A.D.2d 160 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Clarkin v. Staten Island University Hospital
242 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
464 N.E.2d 980, 62 N.Y.2d 661, 476 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perricone-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1984.