Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals

77 Ohio St. 3d 1229
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1997·No. No. 95-2495·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997).

77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related