Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals
77 Ohio St. 3d 1229
Opinion
Appellee challenged the constitutionality of Dayton Revised Code of General Ordinances 150.128(E), but failed to serve the Attorney General pursuant to R.C. 2721.12. When a statute or municipal ordinance is challenged in a declaratory judgment action, the failure to serve the Attorney General is a jurisdictional defect that can be raised at any time; therefore, because the courts below lacked jurisdiction, we vacate the judgments of the trial court and the court of appeals, and we dismiss this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Ohio 1997).
77 Ohio St. 3d 1229 (Asbury Apartments v. Dayton Board of Zoning Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cincinnati v. Fourth Natl. Realty, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 6802 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Lemble v. Belknap, Unpublished Decision (9-30-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999
Osborne v. City of Mentor
726 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999)
Leisure v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (10-26-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
Leisure v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., Unpublished Decision (8-31-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998