Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation

259 F.2d 428, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 998, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided October 2, 1958·No. 25345-25347·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinions

[429] PER CURIAM.

The petition for mandamus is denied as moot. The merits relating to the application for a preliminary injunction are now being heard before the district court. For this reason there is no need of appellate decision as to the temporary restraining order or the order which vacated it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation, 259 F.2d 428, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 998, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747 (2d Cir. 1958).

259 F.2d 428 (Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related