Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation

259 F.2d 428, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 998, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1958
Docket25345-25347
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 259 F.2d 428 (Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arvida Corporation v. Honorable Sidney Sugarman, United States District Judge, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arvida Corporation, 259 F.2d 428, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 998, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747 (2d Cir. 1958).

Opinions

[429]*429PER CURIAM.

The petition for mandamus is denied as moot. The merits relating to the application for a preliminary injunction are now being heard before the district court. For this reason there is no need of appellate decision as to the temporary restraining order or the order which vacated it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 F.2d 428, 1 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 998, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arvida-corporation-v-honorable-sidney-sugarman-united-states-district-ca2-1958.