Arthur v. Herold

100 U.S. 75
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. ■

We think it was not error for the court to say to the jury that ground chicory was the same thing, as burnt chicory. The chicory root cannot- be ground until it is burned, and burnt chicory is not an article of commerce until it is ground. [78]*78Whether or not the article importéd was a new preparation, and something other than ground chicory, that is to say, whether it was prepared chicory and not simply ground chicory, was a question of fact that was properly left to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur v. Herold, 100 U.S. 75 (1879).

100 U.S. 75 (Arthur v. Herold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arthur v. Herold
100 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1879)